| |
modernmicroscopy
:
columns
:
"how to" tutorial series
Sénarmont Compensation: How to Accurately Measure
Small Relative Retardations (0-1λ)
| by |
John Gustav Delly, Scientific Advisor, College of Microscopy, Westmont, IL |
| 7/5/2003 (revised 2/18/2004) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | NEXT>> |
INTRODUCTION
Compensators consist of thin-sections of
minerals (e.g., quartz, calcite, gypsum/selenite, mica, etc.), or polymer film
equivalents, whose thickness and optical orientation are carefully controlled
so as to provide known values of retardation and known direction of high and
low refractive indices. When introduced into the light path of a polarizing
microscope, these known retardation values and refractive index directions are
superimposed on an unknown anisotropic specimen and, by noting the resultant
effects (addition or subtraction of retardation, etc.), the microscopist
obtains valuable identifying characteristics about the sample.
Compensators, such as the first-order red (530 nm;
550 nm; also known as the “gypsum plate,” or “selenite plate,” or “sensitive
violet”), the quarter-wave plate (λ/4; ~137 nm), and the quartz wedge
(3-7 orders; 1-4λ), are standard accessories used with polarizing
microscopes for determining an anisotropic specimen’s optic sign (sign
of double refraction), sign of elongation (location of high and low refractive
indices in an elongated specimen), and characteristic birefringence.
Birefringence determination requires that one obtain the sample thickness
and retardation color (B = r/t 1000). For the majority of samples encountered
by industrial microscopists, an estimate of the thickness obtained through
use of a calibrated eyepiece micrometer, and an estimate of the retardation
color obtained by reference to a Michel-Lévy
Interference Color Chart (1), are usually sufficient, along
with a couple of other characteristics, for rapid sample identification.
For the purposes of this article, it will be assumed that the reader is
generally familiar with these procedures.
Problems in obtaining the birefringence, and,
therefore, the identification, arise especially when the retardation colors of
the sample are very low (shades of gray in the lower part of the first order)
or very high (100-200+ orders). These very low or very high retardation colors
may be due to the sample being either very thick or very thin, or having very
low or very high characteristic birefringence, or both.
|
click image to enlarge (521K) 
Figure 1 |
Look at Figure 1, for example; this is
a 30 µm thick rock thin-section as viewed between crossed polarizers using
a 4X objective for a visual magnification of 40X. The individual mineral
grains that make up this rock section are all lying at different orientations,
and showing many shades of white and gray. When I view this figure filling
up my monitor screen, I can go from grain to grain and name off colors:
snow white, off- white, bone, ivory, cream, steel gray, bluish gray, greenish
gray, light gray, medium gray, dark gray, charcoal, blue-green gray, olive
gray, slate gray, gun metal, mushroom, etc. What I need, however, are
not these often-creative verbal descriptions, but a value in nanometers,
that the color I am looking at corresponds to; this is why I prefer a
Michel-Lévy Interference Color Chart with colors printed as accurately
as possible, but with the names of the colors as well. Only with
an accurate determination of interference color can I obtain the characteristic
birefringence that I need to identify the mineral (and, of course, the
sample need not be a mineral; it could be anything). A little later,
you will see from experiments I made with experienced microscopists that
their estimates of retardation are not very accurate. The accurate measurement
of very low or very high values of retardation is the realm of the specialized
compensators. For very low values of retardation, there are the Brace
and Brace-Köhler compensators which measure in the range 0-1/10λ,
0-1/20λ, and 0-1/30λ; many bio-medical specimens fall in this
category. The Berek compensators are made for measuring larger ranges
of retardation: 0-3λ, 0-20λ. The Ehringhaus compensators are
used for measuring very large values of retardation: 170-200+λ; these
are useful for highly birefringent samples, which also may be thick.
The Berek compensator is particularly well-suited for measuring
retardations from zero up to many orders. It is based on an experimental
compensator by W. Nikitin [Drehbarer Compensator fϋr Mikroskope.
Zeitschr. f. Kryst., XLVII (1910), 378-379], in which a crystal
plate (quartz in the early version made by Fuess) cut perpendicular to
the c-axis is introduced above the objective. In its starting position
– pointer set at “0” – the crystal surface is normal to the instrument
axis, and the field of view will be dark between crossed polarizers, because
the uniaxial indicatrix in this position exhibits a circular index ellipse
(retardation 0). The crystal plate can be tilted about the direction
of vibration of the ordinary ray, so that the circular section changes
into an index ellipse in which the ratio of major to minor axis increases
with the tilt angle; the effective thickness is thereby increased. As
with Sénarmont compensation, the anisotropic specimen is oriented in a
subtractive position so that at some tilt angle extinction occurs, provided
the compensator’s range is sufficient for the sample. Berek made mechanical
refinements to this compensator so that the tilt angle could be read to
1/10 of a degree (1/20 degree in the current version); and he further
developed the equations and tables to convert tilt angles into retardation
values. The resolution of the readout of a current Leica/Leitz 5-order
Berek compensator with magnesium fluoride crystal plate is equal to 0.2nm
at a retardation of 3nm; 0.5nm at a retardation of 25nm; and 2nm at a
retardation of 556nm. Many microscopists find the Berek compensator more
useful than the Sénarmont, provided they can justify the additional expense.
The Sénarmont does have higher resolution, but it is only realized by
averaging over several measurements. Over the last 170 years or so, there
have been about a hundred different kinds of compensators described and
made, but only the simple fixed ones and a couple of Bereks and Brace-Köhlers
have been available new in the last two or three decades. You can read
about many of these specialized compensators (Babinet, Bravais, Soleil,
Biot, Savart, Klein, Traube, Sommerfeldt, Wright, Nikitin, Evans, Von
Fedorow, Von Chrustschoff, etc.) in Johannsen’s Manual of
Petrographic Methods (2).
| 7/5/2003 (revised 2/18/2004) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | NEXT>> |
|