| |
modernmicroscopy
:
columns
:
@ the eyepoint
@ the EyePoint
The Literature of Classical Microchemistry, Spot Tests, and Chemical Microscopy
| by |
John Gustav Delly, Scientific Advisor, College of Microscopy, Westmont, IL |
H. BEHRENS
A serious source of error in all
microchemical methods is the fact that slight differences in the conditions
under which crystallization takes place may profoundly affect the form and
appearance of the crystals produced during a reaction: the acidity or
alkalinity needs to be controlled in a number of cases; the concentrations of
test substances and/or reagents may be important; and there are the cases in
which interfering ions must first be removed. The microchemical tests published up to this point in
our survey were full of these problems. Furthermore, there were still several
gaps in Klément and Rénard's collection of reactions, and Professor Streng's
manual did not have a means for detecting cadmium or nickel.
Professor H. Behrens (Figure 14) at the Hochschule in
Delft, Holland directed his efforts to removing the sources of error in the
published tests, and introducing many new and elegant methods. In addition
to rigorously testing all the older reactions and methods, he added the data
he obtained on the reliability and limits of applicability of the tests, as
well as appending his notes and cautions to his accounts of the various reactions. He also added
tests for the rarer elements that were only then being found to be more widely
distributed in the earth's crust than was formerly supposed. Behrens wrote
articles on his microchemical methods in Dutch, German, and French.
click image to enlarge (166K)
Figure
14. Professor H. Behrens. Portrait in McCrone Research Institute
Museum. |
Professor John W. Judd, of the Royal College of Science,
London had been using microchemical methods for mineral identification in the
Geological Laboratories of that institution. He learned of them when he met Boricky while
on a visit to Prague in 1875, two years before Boricky's monograph appeared. Later,
Professor H. Behrens decided to translate his own book on microchemical
analysis into English, and asked Professor Judd for his cooperation in bringing
out this new edition. Thus far, there had been no books in English on this
subject except for Wormley's treatise, which was devoted to poisons, and so
Professor Judd did not hesitate to accede. And, thus, in 1894, we see the
publication in English of, A Manual of
Microchemical Analysis [Behrens,
H. (1894)], to which Professor Judd contributed an Introduction. This
is a very nice book to own - not absolutely necessary, because the tests will
be in Chamot and Mason, but from an historical perspective, you may enjoy
critical comments, such as (page 101), "Haushofer has tried to develop
staining of gelatinous silica with fuchsine... into a microchemical test. It
is not of sufficient delicacy for this purpose; besides, the stain, recommended
by me for specimens of rocks, is of no use for gelatinous silica suspended
in a liquid."
Behrens ends the century with the 1899 publication of his Anleitung zur mikrochemischen Analyse, and
will open the new century with still another work.
Meanwhile, in America, a young man, Émile Monnin Chamot,
from Buffalo, New York, entered Cornell University in 1887, graduated with a
B.S. in 1891, and qualified for the Ph.D. in 1897. His interests were in
toxicology and sanitary chemistry, and he had been introduced to the
application of microscopy to chemistry by Professor George Caldwell, the first
head of the Chemistry Department there. As was customary at the time, Chamot
then went abroad for post-doctoral work. He spent a year at the University of Nancy training in toxicology with Mace, and in Delft studying inorganic
qualitative analysis with Professor Behrens. On his return to America, and
as the century closes, Chamot initiated a series of papers on microchemical
analysis that appeared in the Journal of
Applied Microscopy, starting in 1899.
Before leaving the 19th century, it would be well to note
that there were very important, parallel developments going on, such as Otto
Lehmann’s introduction of hotstage methods, Michel-Lévy's interference color
chart, advances in optical crystallography, and even other microchemical
methods in botany and physiology (urinary sediments, etc.).
|